Programs for diversity, equity, and inclusion at some of the largest corporations in the nation began to unravel one by one in 2024, and there are indications that efforts to undo DEI projects will only intensify in 2025.
Prominent individuals who have openly opposed DEI initiatives have increased in number this year, including Chip Wilson, the creator of Lululemon, and Elon Musk. Big businesses including Walmart, Lowe’s, Ford, and Toyota responded to the cries and rolled back their DEI initiatives, especially following influencer campaigns on social media led by Robby Starbuck.
In the meanwhile, three additional states—Idaho, Kansas, and Indiana—banned colleges from demanding diversity statements in hiring and admissions, and Utah, Alabama, and Iowa joined Florida and Texas in prohibiting DEI offices in their public universities.
That was all after a nationwide social justice movement was sparked by George Floyd’s 2020 murder by Minneapolis police, which led to numerous businesses pledging broad support for diversity initiatives.
However, DEI’s future is in jeopardy since President-elect Donald Trump and his team have promised to eliminate government supported diversity programs.
According to Nika White, whose company focuses on DEI, the industry has had a difficult year.
The argument for outlawing DEI programs in business and academia, particularly in light of the current political environment, frequently overlooks the fact that these initiatives are meant to raise standards by guaranteeing that all individuals, regardless of background, have an equal chance to contribute and achieve, she said.
DEI opponents have a very different perspective on those projects. “X,DEI is just another word for racism,” Musk stated on his social media channel. JD Vance, the vice president-elect, co-introduced the Dismantle DEI Act in June while serving as a senator, claiming that DEI is a divisive ideology that incites hatred and racial discord. Near the end of his first term in 2020, Trump signed an executive order banning federal DEI programs, which Joe Biden overturned shortly after he assumed office. A request for comment from the Trump transition team was not answered.
During one of the more severe attacks on the policy during the 2016 presidential election, Democratic nominee Kamala Harris was referred to as a DEI hire. Others asserted that DEI makes flying dangerous, and a politician unjustly blamed the March collapse of the Baltimore bridge on DEI.
According to White, anti-Black bigotry is frequently the source of these attacks. Billionaire entrepreneurs who have the power to restrict DEI programs frequently do so by claiming that DEI programs put identification above ability or citing colorblindness or meritocracy. They erode the gains of the last few decades, causing a chilling effect that may further polarize our society and restricting organizations’ capacity to have candid discussions about equity, inclusion, and race—discussions that are essential to our country’s progress.
Demonizing DEI, she continued, ignores the structural obstacles that many marginalized groups must overcome in order to succeed in settings where they are not respected or represented.
Not quite a death knell
It appears that it will take an enormous amount of work if 2025 is the year DEI dies, as some people hope. Trump has threatened to strip noncompliant colleges and universities of their government money and accreditation, and they will face legal repercussions.
On the corporate side, several organizations have maintained, however covertly, diversity and inclusion programs. CEOs such as Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase Bank described themselves as full-throated, patriotic, red-blooded, unwoke, capitalist CEOs who have remained steadfast in their dedication to DEI. A diverse workforce is beneficial for businesses, according to Shark Tank host and former Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban.
To fend off the threats, Fatimah Gilliam, the author of Race Rules: What Your Black Friends Won’t Tell You and the head of the DEI consulting business The Azara Group, hopes to hear more voices like those in the next year. She noted that corporate leaders’ quiet and the surrender of colleges and companies have been depressing, or what she refers to as profiles in lack of courage.
According to Gilliam, when the negative discourse surrounding DEI continues unchecked, individuals begin to defend this new normal rather than merely comply with it.
According to a poll conducted by College Rover, a website that helps users navigate the complexities of college applications, 70% of student respondents said that DEI has a positive overall influence on college campuses, and 54% of them support DEI and advocate for required DEI courses.
The CEO and founder of College Rover, Bill Townsend, once observed, “You can’t throw out the good with the bad.” Does DEI have flaws? Yes, but it continues to function. However, the pupils are aware that many positive aspects are being eliminated along with the negative ones.
The socialization and exposure to a range of viewpoints and experiences that come with a diverse student body are part of working at Townsend. According to him, 55% of Republican students who participated in the study stated they had a favorable opinion of DEI.
According to him, the main advantage of DEI is that it exposes them to ethnic groups and perspectives on ethnicities that differ from their upbringing. We must coexist and collaborate with others who are not like us. DEI assists us in controlling that dynamic. Eliminating DEI serves as a reminder that you don’t have to get along with everyone. That isn’t how it should be.
Furthermore, research conducted by the Boston Consulting Group on over 27,000 workers across 16 countries demonstrates that DEI initiatives boost revenue and foster employee loyalty.According to White, a lot of executives are strengthening their DEI commitments not only because it’s the moral thing to do but also because they see that inclusivity fosters innovation, employee happiness, and organizational success.
Through scathing social media posts, DEI critic Robby Starbuck spearheaded a campaign in 2024 to get businesses, including the massive Walmart, to discontinue their DEI initiatives.
In response to a request for comment regarding his 2025 plans, Starbucks stated, “I do have a list of targets he will pressure to drop DEI.”
The DEI experts, White and Gilliam, recognized the impact of Starbucks. Some businesses have therefore rebranded diversity, equality, and inclusion as inclusion and belonging, among other terms, since they wish to maintain DEI but are worried about the negative reaction.
DEI, the letters and what they mean, are a problem for people, Townsend said, adding that diversity and inclusivity may be less confrontational.
DEI proponents stated that they don’t care what the term is. All they want is for it to be safe.
I m pessimistic about the future of DEI because I see things as they are happening, Gilliam said. But I do think there s hope, but the hope has to come from people on an individual basis. People need to stand up and make a decision to impact what s actually taking place. You won t stand up and support me, I won t support you by spending my dollars with your company. And I m going to tell everyone else not to as well. We have to put a stake in the ground and take a stand that s just as aggressive as theirs. It s that important.
Note: Every piece of content is rigorously reviewed by our team of experienced writers and editors to ensure its accuracy. Our writers use credible sources and adhere to strict fact-checking protocols to verify all claims and data before publication. If an error is identified, we promptly correct it and strive for transparency in all updates, feel free to reach out to us via email. We appreciate your trust and support!