Donald Trump, the incoming president, ran on tariffs. He made even more promises this week.
Trump stated on Monday that he plans to increase a previously planned tariff of up to 60% on all Chinese imports by an extra 10% and slap a 25% tariff on goods imported by the United States from Mexico and Canada.
The duties would represent a substantial rise over Trump’s earlier proposal, which was already a big increase over more targeted tariffs that Trump implemented during his first term and that President Joe Biden maintained.
According to a Yale Budget Lab assessment that was shared with NBC News on Wednesday, if retaliatory charges on U.S. exports are implemented, the average cost to consumers of the tariffs Trump has proposed could be as high as $1,200 in lost purchasing power based on 2023 salaries.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has already threatened to slap retaliatory tariffs in response to any additional U.S. duties. The Associated Press reports that Canada is also weighing its own options, which may include imposing duties on American imports.
Oil is America’s largest import from Canada, therefore any rise in energy costs would probably have an impact on the entire economy.
Ernie Tedeschi, the director of The Budget Lab and the former chief economist in the Biden administration, said in an email that this can also be thought of as four to five months of inflation in one fell swoop.
Trump has chosen three nations for a fresh round of targeted tariff ideas. Canada, Mexico, and China account for almost half of all U.S. imports.
The majority of economists concur that tariffs ultimately result in higher prices for consumers, despite Trump’s insistence that other nations bear the expense. Additionally, the kinds of commodities that could face greater pricing are the ones that consumers deal with on a daily basis at a time when price increases are still a major worry.
Some businesses are cautioning that areas of the economy that rely heavily on imports may be particularly badly hit. Corie Barry, the CEO of Best Buy, cautioned on Tuesday that our customers would bear the additional expenses associated with U.S. imports. As of 2023, the majority of U.S. imports from China are electronic items.
In [the] consumer electronics industry, virtually little is not imported. People need these products, so raising the price isn’t beneficial, Barry added.
The largest effect from Mexico would be felt by auto buyers, since last year’s imports totaled $130 billion.The U.S. auto industry has yet to comment on the potential effects of Trump’s actions on the industry. However, any cost hike would occur at a time when American consumers are already having difficulty financing their car purchases.
A sizable portion of the fresh food consumed in the United States is imported from Mexico.
In the past, Trump has threatened various things, including tariffs, and his actions have been erratic and inconsistent. Nevertheless, companies, retail associations, and economists are paying attention to the most recent remarks.
The National Retail Federation issued a warning about the effects of tariffs on regular households in a statement to NBC News last week.
According to the organization’s statement, Americans do not want their family finances to be under increasing strain. Consumers will pay more for both discretionary and non-discretionary goods and services, according to every reliable, unbiased study on the subject of increasing tariffs on our trade partners.
In response to NBC News’s request for comment, a Trump representative sent the following statement:
President Trump imposed tariffs on China during his first term, which boosted investment, produced employment, and prevented inflation. By reshoring American jobs, reducing inflation, increasing real wages, lowering taxes, reducing regulations, and unleashing American energy, President Trump will act swiftly to repair and restore an economy that puts American workers first.
Conservative media friends of Trump have mostly dismissed economic worries about tariffs, characterizing the president-elect’s threats as a chess move to compel Canada and Mexico to follow his immigration and fentanyl policies.
Former Trump spokesperson and Fox News host Kayleigh McEnany stated on the network Tuesday that it’s a tale about the art of the deal. I would argue that President Trump has done a very good job of launching the first volley of a forceful negotiation.
Rep. Dan Crenshaw, a Republican from Texas, stated on Fox News Tuesday that tariffs will harm American consumers. However, they are also useful tools for negotiations.
According to some Trump supporters, the president-elect has no real intention of implementing the suggested tariffs.
Media tycoon Steve Forbes stated on Fox News on Tuesday that he believes President Trump is attempting to convey that such tariffs are unnecessary if we work together to resolve this issue. This has more to do with Mexico gaining control of the border than it does with tariffs in general.
Actually, this year has already seen some progress in reducing drug use and migration: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report that overdose deaths in the United States decreased by 14.5% between June 2023 and June 2024. Additionally, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration has observed a decline in the strength of fentanyl pills for the first time since 2021.
According to data from the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol, migrant flows have drastically decreased this year. Additionally, Mexican President Sheinbaum said that migrant caravans were no longer arriving at the border in a statement in response to Trump’s posts.
According to Douglas Irwin, a trade historian at Dartmouth University, Trump has a tendency to view tariffs as a panacea for a number of the economic problems facing the United States.
This complicates the assessment of their final effectiveness.
“You’re never quite sure why they’re being imposed because Trump co-mingles his objectives for tariffs all at once,” Irwin added.
Is it to generate income, lower the deficit, or restore jobs? He is now discussing tariffs as a way to penalize Canada and Mexico for failing to enforce border controls on migrants and drugs. To determine if they are successful, you must ask yourself what goal you are attempting to accomplish.
Note: Every piece of content is rigorously reviewed by our team of experienced writers and editors to ensure its accuracy. Our writers use credible sources and adhere to strict fact-checking protocols to verify all claims and data before publication. If an error is identified, we promptly correct it and strive for transparency in all updates, feel free to reach out to us via email. We appreciate your trust and support!