Kayla Morris, a former teacher in Texas, spent fifteen years saving every penny she could for a house for her expanding family.
The $282,153.87 that she and her husband received from the sale of the house last year was stashed away in what they believed to be a secure location—an account at the savings startup Yottaheld at a legitimate bank.
Morris has been locked out of her account for six months as of November after becoming entangled in the demise of a fintech company that operates behind the scenes, Synapse, along with thousands of other clients. She hoped that her funds were still safe. After that, she found out how much Evolve Bank & Trust, the lender that was meant to hold her money, was willing to give it back to her.
At a court hearing last week, Morris stumbled as she stated, “We were told last Monday that Evolve was only going to pay us $500 out of that $280,000.” It’s simply heartbreaking.
The situation began in May when Synapse and Evolve Bank’s disagreement over customer balances erupted and the fintech intermediary blocked access to a crucial transaction processing system. By connecting them with small lenders like Evolve, Synapse assisted non-bank fintech companies like Yotta and Juno in providing debit cards and checking accounts.
Following the departure of its fintech clients, Synapse filed for bankruptcy. A court-appointed trustee discovered that up to $96 million in customer monies were gone.
Despite six months of court-mediated attempts amongst the four institutions involved, the question surrounding the whereabouts of those funds remains unsolved. This is primarily because, according to bankruptcy trustee Jelena McWilliams, the estate of Synapse, which is financed by Andreessen Horowitz, lacks the funds to engage an outside company to complete a complete reconciliation of its ledgers.
However, it is now evident that ordinary Americans, like Morris, are the ones who are most affected by this deficit and will get little to nothing from savings accounts that they thought were fully guaranteed by the U.S. government.
The losses highlight the dangers of a system in which consumers relied on startups to manage their money instead of having direct contact with banks, and those businesses then delegated that duty to intermediaries like Synapse.
Reverse bank robbery
Morris is only one among thousands of others. According to data provided by Yotta co-founder and CEO Adam Moelis, 13,725 consumers claim they are being promised a total of $11.8 million at Yotta alone, even though the exact number of people who were shortchanged is still unknown.
Twelve consumers in this situation, who owe amounts ranging from $7,000 to well over $200,000, were interviewed by CNBC.
Teachers, dentists, FedEx workers, and small company owners all talked about how they lost years’ worth of savings when they switched to fintechs like Yotta because of the higher interest rates they offered, the cutting-edge features they offered, or the fact that they were rejected by traditional banks.
Zach Jacobs, a Yotta customer, decided to take action after discovering on Nov. 4 that he was only receiving $128.68 of the $94,468.92 he had placed when he logged onto Evolve’s website.
The 37-year-old business owner from Tampa, Florida, started forming a board of volunteers for a nonprofit called Fight For Our Funds after uniting with other victims online. He hopes that politicians and the media will take notice of them.
3,454 people have signed up so far, and they claim to have lost a total of $30.4 million.
People say, “There’s no way this can happen,” when you tell them about it, according to Jacobs. We were just robbed by a bank. In American history, this is the first instance of a reverse bank heist.
Chicago chemical engineer Andrew Meloan stated that he had hoped to receive his $200,000 investment back from Yotta. He received a surprise $5 PayPal payment from Evolve at the beginning of this month.
Meloan stated that they provided me with an Evolve routing and account number when I signed up. They are now claiming that they only have $5 of my money and that the rest is elsewhere. I think I’ve been duped.
Cracks in the system
The majority of consumers believed that money maintained in accounts covered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation was the safest place to keep their money, in contrast to trading stocks or cryptocurrency wagers, where the user inevitably bears some risk. Individuals used Synapse-powered accounts to save for significant life events like home purchases or operations, as well as for routine costs like rent and groceries.
Since Yotta and other fintechs claimed that deposits were FDIC-insured through Evolve, a number of customers CNBC spoke with thought that signing up sounded like a smart idea.
Morris stated at the hearing last week that we were given the assurance that this was merely a savings account. We are not gamblers or risk-takers.
The FDIC protected user money up to $250,000, according to a Synapse contract clients got after opening checking accounts, a copy of which CNBC was able to view.
The 26-page contract claims that no depositor has ever lost a single penny of FDIC-insured cash.
We are responsible
They have few obvious options to get their money back after being abandoned by U.S. regulators who have so far refused to take any action.
The FDIC made it clear in June that nonbank failures like Synapse are not covered by its insurance fund and that obtaining money through the legal system is not assured in such a case.
The Federal Reserve announced the following month that it would oversee Evolve’s progress in restoring all customer monies to users in its capacity as the bank’s principal federal regulator.
In a letter, Fed General Counsel Mark E. Van Der Weide stated that it is our duty to make sure the bank operates in a safe and sound way and conforms with all applicable laws, particularly those that protect customers.
The FDIC proposed a new rule in September that would require banks to maintain comprehensive records for fintech app users, increasing the likelihood that they would be covered in the event of a future disaster and lowering the possibility that money would disappear.
Last week, McWilliams, a former chair of the FDIC under the first Trump administration, expressed her disappointment to the California judge presiding over the Synapse bankruptcy case that other financial regulators have chosen not to assist.
McWilliams did not reply to inquiries, and the Fed and FDIC declined to comment for this story.
Winners and losers
It hadn’t always seemed so hopeless. McWilliams proposed to Judge Martin Barash early in the proceedings that clients get a partial payment, thus distributing the burden among all parties.
However, that would have necessitated more communication between Evolve and the other lenders holding client cash than actually occurred.
While Evolve took months to complete what it had first claimed would be a thorough reconciliation, the three other institutions—AMG National Trust, Lineage Bank, and American Bank—started allocating the money they had while the hearings went on.
Evolve said that it could only identify the user funds it retained and not the location of the lost cash by the time it finished its operations in October. A lawyer representing Evolve testified last week that this is due in part to very big bulk transfers of monies without identifying the money’s owner.
Consequently, there are relative winners and losers from the bankruptcy process.
Some end users recently received all their funds back, while others, like Indiana FedEx driverNatasha Craft, received none, she told CNBC.
Nothing optimistic
Evolve says that the vast majority of funds held for Yotta and other customers were moved to other banks in October and November of 2023 on directions from Synapse, according to an Evolve spokesman.
Where those end user funds went after that is an important question, but unfortunately not one Evolve can answer with the data it currently has, the spokesman said.
Yotta says that Evolve has given fintech firms and the trustee no information about how it determined payouts, despite acknowledging in court that a shortfall existed at Evolve prior to October 2023, according to a spokesman for the startup, who noted that several executives have recently left the bank. We hope regulators take notice and act.
Statementsreleased ahead of this month s hearing, Evolve said that other banks refused to participate in its efforts to create a master ledger, while AMG and Lineage said that Evolve s implication that they had the missing funds was irresponsible and disingenuous.
As the banks and other parties hurl accusations at each other and lawsuits pile up, including pending class-action efforts, the window for cooperation is rapidly closing, Barash said last week.
As time goes by, my impression is that unless the banks that are involved can sort this out voluntarily, it may not get sorted out, Barash said. There s nothing optimistic about what I m telling you.
Note: Every piece of content is rigorously reviewed by our team of experienced writers and editors to ensure its accuracy. Our writers use credible sources and adhere to strict fact-checking protocols to verify all claims and data before publication. If an error is identified, we promptly correct it and strive for transparency in all updates, feel free to reach out to us via email. We appreciate your trust and support!