A federal judge chastised Rudy Giuliani on Thursday for offering a “farcical” explanation of why
he hasn’t complied
with a court order to
turn over valuables
to former Georgia election workers he defamed after the 2020 presidential campaign.
U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman made the remark in a New York courtroom after an attorney for Giuliani, the former mayor of New York, claimed he wasn’t sure where some of his belongings are.
“The notion that your client doesn’t have any knowledge of where his assets are located is farcical,” Liman told Giuliani lawyer Ken Caruso.
Giuliani, a onetime personal attorney to President-elect Donald Trump, had been ordered to transfer personal property, “including cash accounts, jewelry and valuables,” to former election workers Ruby Freeman and her daughter Shaye Moss by Oct. 29 in order to begin complying with the
$146 million
defamation
judgment
.
The judge ordered Thursday’s hearing after attorneys for Freeman and Moss said Giuliani had
failed to turn over
any of the items he was expressly ordered to surrender, which include a signed Joe DiMaggio jersey, a luxury watch collection and jewelry.
Lawyer Aaron Nathan said that when they entered Giuliani’s New York apartment last week, they found that the valuables and some furniture had been removed.
Giuliani told reporters Thursday that “they lied” about items being moved.
In a court filing, Nathan noted that a real estate listing for the $5.7 million apartment, which Giuliani has to turn over to Freeman and Moss, had shown the framed DiMaggio jersey hanging in the living room. He
contrasted that with a picture
taken on Oct. 31, when they entered the apartment, showing the jersey and numerous other items were no longer there.
“There has been nothing but game playing,” Nathan said.
Giuliani maintains the items have always been where he says they are: in his Palm Beach, Florida, and New York homes and a storage facility in Ronkonkoma on Long Island, New York, which he claims he cannot access.
He has also said he’s not sure exactly which assets he still has and where they might be. Nathan pushed back against that assertion in a court filing, calling it “stunning” since the list of items came from Giuliani’s own disclosures this year in his now-dismissed
bankruptcy case
.
In court, Caruso tried to argue that there were two items Giuliani shouldn’t have to hand over — a 1980 Mercedes-Benz that formerly belonged to Hollywood icon Lauren Bacall and a watch that belonged to Giuliani’s grandfather.
Giuliani spoke about the watch to reporters before Thursday’s hearing, saying “the law says” Freeman and Moss are “not entitled to a lot of” what they’re seeking.
“For example, they want my grandfather’s watch. It’s 150 years old. That’s a bit of an heirloom. Usually you don’t get those unless you’re involved in a political persecution,” Giuliani said.
In court, Caruso told the judge it was “vindictive” of Freeman and Moss to ask for the watch, a claim the judge angrily shot down.
Liman said he regularly presides over cases in which debtors big and small have to turn over family heirlooms.
“If they owe a debt, they have to pay a debt. It doesn’t matter if it was handed down,” Liman said.
Caruso also argued that his client should be able to keep the Mercedes — which Giuliani
took to Trump’s polling place
in Florida on Election Day — and said it was worth less than $4,000.
The judge denied that request and ordered Giuliani to hand over the title and the keys to the car in the coming days.
“All the property must be turned over to the receiver, and if not I will hold him in contempt,” the judge said of Giuliani.
After court, Giuliani said told reporters: “I will turn over everything I’m legally obligated to turn over. … They’ve been less than clear.”
Attorneys for Freeman and Moss noted that both the car and the watch were explicitly mentioned in the judge’s
Oct. 22 order
.
Giuliani was hit with the
massive
monetary
judgment
last year after a judge found him liable for repeatedly defaming Freeman and Moss with his accusations that they committed fraud during the 2020 election.
Giuliani’s allegations were investigated and
found to be meritless
, but he hasn’t backed off of them.
“I did not defame them,” he told reporters Thursday.
Note: Thank you for visiting our website! We strive to keep you informed with the latest updates based on expected timelines, although please note that we are not affiliated with any official bodies. Our team is committed to ensuring accuracy and transparency in our reporting, verifying all information before publication. We aim to bring you reliable news, and if you have any questions or concerns about our content, feel free to reach out to us via email. We appreciate your trust and support!